↓ Skip to main content

Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Primary Care, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Grunfeld, Donna Manca, Rahim Moineddin, Kevin E Thorpe, Jeffrey S Hoch, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Christopher Meaney, Jess Rogers, Jaclyn Beca, Paul Krueger, Muhammad Mamdani, for the BETTER Trial Investigators

Abstract

Primary care provides most of the evidence-based chronic disease prevention and screening services offered by the healthcare system. However, there remains a gap between recommended preventive services and actual practice. This trial (the BETTER Trial) aimed to improve preventive care of heart disease, diabetes, colorectal, breast and cervical cancers, and relevant lifestyle factors through a practice facilitation intervention set in primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 68 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 16 6%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 74 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,534,815
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#624
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,857
of 315,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.