You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparative study of ethanol production using dilute acid, ionic liquid and AFEX™ pretreated corn stover
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1754-6834-7-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nirmal Uppugundla, Leonardo da Costa Sousa, Shishir PS Chundawat, Xiurong Yu, Blake Simmons, Seema Singh, Xiadi Gao, Rajeev Kumar, Charles E Wyman, Bruce E Dale, Venkatesh Balan |
Abstract |
In a biorefinery producing cellulosic biofuels, biomass pretreatment will significantly influence the efficacy of enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation. Comparison of different biomass pretreatment techniques by studying the impact of pretreatment on downstream operations at industrially relevant conditions and performing comprehensive mass balances will help focus attention on necessary process improvements, and thereby help reduce the cost of biofuel production. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
France | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 228 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 18% |
Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
Researcher | 30 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
Other | 41 | 17% |
Unknown | 60 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 20% |
Engineering | 39 | 16% |
Chemical Engineering | 23 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 6% |
Chemistry | 14 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 11% |
Unknown | 74 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#881
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,745
of 241,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.