You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-90 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathleen Rosa, Min Fu, Leen Gilles, Karin Cerri, Monika Peeters, Jeffrey Bubb, Jane Scott |
Abstract |
Fatigue is a common symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (cHCV) infection and a common side effect of interferon-based treatment for cHCV. This study provides confirmatory evidence of the reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) to document fatigue in cHCV research and identifies values that indicate clinically important differences in FSS to aid in interpreting fatigue in cHCV clinical trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,989,215
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#803
of 2,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,768
of 228,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.