You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of structural diversity in wolf-like canids reveals post-domestication variants
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-465 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oscar Ramirez, Iñigo Olalde, Jonas Berglund, Belen Lorente-Galdos, Jessica Hernandez-Rodriguez, Javier Quilez, Matthew T Webster, Robert K Wayne, Carles Lalueza-Fox, Carles Vilà, Tomas Marques-Bonet |
Abstract |
Although a variety of genetic changes have been implicated in causing phenotypic differences among dogs, the role of copy number variants (CNVs) and their impact on phenotypic variation is still poorly understood. Further, very limited knowledge exists on structural variation in the gray wolf, the ancestor of the dog, or other closely related wild canids. Documenting CNVs variation in wild canids is essential to identify ancestral states and variation that may have appeared after domestication. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Sweden | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
Researcher | 15 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 25% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#5,932,028
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,364
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,768
of 231,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#31
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.