↓ Skip to main content

Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients with diabetes: results of a randomized trial and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of systematic screening

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients with diabetes: results of a randomized trial and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of systematic screening
Published in
Trials, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel M Lièvre, Philippe Moulin, Charles Thivolet, Michel Rodier, Vincent Rigalleau, Alfred Penfornis, Alain Pradignac, Michel Ovize

Abstract

Most guidelines recommend a systematic screening of asymptomatic high risk patients with diabetes for silent ischemia, but the clinical benefit of this strategy has not been demonstrated compared with the simple control of cardiovascular risk factors. We sought to determine whether referring asymptomatic diabetic patients for screening of silent ischemia decreases the risk of cardiovascular events compared with usual care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 186 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 47 24%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 47 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,608,929
of 15,625,699 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,274
of 4,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,982
of 192,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,625,699 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them