↓ Skip to main content

Tight associations between transcription promoter type and epigenetic variation in histone positioning and modification

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tight associations between transcription promoter type and epigenetic variation in histone positioning and modification
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tadasu Nozaki, Nozomu Yachie, Ryu Ogawa, Anton Kratz, Rintaro Saito, Masaru Tomita

Abstract

Transcription promoters are fundamental genomic cis-elements controlling gene expression. They can be classified into two types by the degree of imprecision of their transcription start sites: peak promoters, which initiate transcription from a narrow genomic region; and broad promoters, which initiate transcription from a wide-ranging region. Eukaryotic transcription initiation is suggested to be associated with the genomic positions and modifications of nucleosomes. For instance, it has been recently shown that histone with H3K9 acetylation (H3K9ac) is more likely to be distributed around broad promoters rather than peak promoters; it can thus be inferred that there is an association between histone H3K9 and promoter architecture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
China 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 53 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 32%
Unspecified 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2011.
All research outputs
#16,704,527
of 24,569,575 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,994
of 11,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,348
of 126,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#42
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,569,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.