↓ Skip to main content

The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a study to examine influences on cognitive ageing from age 11 to age 70 and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a study to examine influences on cognitive ageing from age 11 to age 70 and beyond
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, December 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-7-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian J Deary, Alan J Gow, Michelle D Taylor, Janie Corley, Caroline Brett, Valerie Wilson, Harry Campbell, Lawrence J Whalley, Peter M Visscher, David J Porteous, John M Starr

Abstract

Cognitive ageing is a major burden for society and a major influence in lowering people's independence and quality of life. It is the most feared aspect of ageing. There are large individual differences in age-related cognitive changes. Seeking the determinants of cognitive ageing is a research priority. A limitation of many studies is the lack of a sufficiently long period between cognitive assessments to examine determinants. Here, the aim is to examine influences on cognitive ageing between childhood and old age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 4%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 244 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 24%
Researcher 49 19%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Neuroscience 16 6%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 57 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,231,062
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#218
of 3,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,735
of 160,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.