↓ Skip to main content

Relationships between lead biomarkers and diurnal salivary cortisol indices in pregnant women from Mexico City: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationships between lead biomarkers and diurnal salivary cortisol indices in pregnant women from Mexico City: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Environmental Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-13-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph M Braun, Rosalind J Wright, Allan C Just, Melinda C Power, Marcela Tamayo y Ortiz, Lourdes Schnaas, Howard Hu, Robert O Wright, Martha Maria Tellez-Rojo

Abstract

Lead (Pb) exposure during pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse maternal, infant, or childhood health outcomes by interfering with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function. We examined relationships between maternal blood or bone Pb concentrations and features of diurnal cortisol profiles in 936 pregnant women from Mexico City.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 37 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Psychology 12 10%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 36 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,135,069
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#712
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,158
of 229,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.