You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: why cure crowds out prevention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Bishai, Ligia Paina, Qingfeng Li, David H Peters, Adnan A Hyder |
Abstract |
This paper presents a system dynamics computer simulation model to illustrate unintended consequences of apparently rational allocations to curative and preventive services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 15% |
Australia | 11 | 13% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 1% |
Papua New Guinea | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Congo | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 47 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 66 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 9% |
Scientists | 8 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Nepal | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Serbia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 219 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 16% |
Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Other | 51 | 22% |
Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 39 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
Engineering | 9 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
Other | 43 | 19% |
Unknown | 52 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#827,007
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#57
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,208
of 230,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.