You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and factors associated with wound colonization by Staphylococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureusin hospitalized patients in inland northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-328 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gilmara Celli Maia Almeida, Marquiony Marques dos Santos, Nara Grazieli Martins Lima, Thiago André Cidral, Maria Celeste Nunes Melo, Kenio Costa Lima |
| Abstract |
Infections by Staphylococcus spp. are often associated with wounds, especially in hospitalized patients. Wounds may be the source of bacteria causing cross-contamination, and are a risk factor for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of wound colonization by Staphylococcus spp., especially S. aureus and MRSA, in hospitalized patients, and to identify the factors associated with such colonization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,820
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6,454
of 7,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,302
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#156
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.