↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of increased vegetable and fruit consumption on body weight and energy intake

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of increased vegetable and fruit consumption on body weight and energy intake
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4664-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. T. Mytton, K. Nnoaham, H. Eyles, P. Scarborough, C. Ni Mhurchu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,129,472
of 24,192,521 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,623
of 15,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,011
of 322,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#58
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,192,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.