↓ Skip to main content

Notochord-derived hedgehog is essential for tail regeneration in Xenopus tadpole

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Developmental Biology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Notochord-derived hedgehog is essential for tail regeneration in Xenopus tadpole
Published in
BMC Developmental Biology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-213x-14-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuka Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Makoto Mochii

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,099,609
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#258
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,476
of 230,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.