↓ Skip to main content

Creatine monohydrate supplementation on lower-limb muscle power in Brazilian elite soccer players

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creatine monohydrate supplementation on lower-limb muscle power in Brazilian elite soccer players
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-11-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

João G Claudino, Bruno Mezêncio, Sérgio Amaral, Vinícius Zanetti, Fabiana Benatti, Hamilton Roschel, Bruno Gualano, Alberto C Amadio, Julio C Serrão

Abstract

Studies involving chronic creatine supplementation in elite soccer players are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on lower-limb muscle power in Brazilian elite soccer players (n = 14 males) during pre-season training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 279 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 23%
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 78 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 86 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 90 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#673,090
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#183
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,693
of 442,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#179
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.