↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between genome and epigenome - challenges and requirements for future research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between genome and epigenome - challenges and requirements for future research
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-487
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geneviève Almouzni, Lucia Altucci, Bruno Amati, Neil Ashley, David Baulcombe, Nathalie Beaujean, Christoph Bock, Erik Bongcam-Rudloff, Jean Bousquet, Sigurd Braun, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Marion Bussemakers, Laura Clarke, Ana Conesa, Xavier Estivill, Alireza Fazeli, Neža Grgurević, Ivo Gut, Bastiaan T Heijmans, Sylvie Hermouet, Jeanine Houwing–Duistermaat, Ilaria Iacobucci, Janez Ilaš, Raju Kandimalla, Susanne Krauss-Etschmann, Paul Lasko, Sören Lehmann, Anders Lindroth, Gregor Majdič, Eric Marcotte, Giovanni Martinelli, Nadine Martinet, Eric Meyer, Cristina Miceli, Ken Mills, Maria Moreno-Villanueva, Ghislaine Morvan, Dörthe Nickel, Beate Niesler, Mariusz Nowacki, Jacek Nowak, Stephan Ossowski, Mattia Pelizzola, Roland Pochet, Uroš Potočnik, Magdalena Radwanska, Jeroen Raes, Magnus Rattray, Mark D Robinson, Bernard Roelen, Sascha Sauer, Dieter Schinzer, Eline Slagboom, Tim Spector, Hendrik G Stunnenberg, Ekaterini Tiligada, Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla, Roula Tsonaka, Ann Van Soom, Melita Vidaković, Martin Widschwendter

Abstract

Understanding the links between genetic, epigenetic and non-genetic factors throughout the lifespan and across generations and their role in disease susceptibility and disease progression offer entirely new avenues and solutions to major problems in our society. To overcome the numerous challenges, we have come up with nine major conclusions to set the vision for future policies and research agendas at the European level.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 150 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Professor 18 11%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 12 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 21 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,161,071
of 13,847,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,576
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,262
of 189,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,847,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.