↓ Skip to main content

Protocol of the baseline assessment for the Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) Wales cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol of the baseline assessment for the Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) Wales cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca A Hill, Sinead Brophy, Huw Brunt, Mel Storey, Non E Thomas, Catherine A Thornton, Stephen Palmer, Frank Dunstan, Shantini Paranjothy, Roderick McClure, Sarah E Rodgers, Ronan A Lyons

Abstract

Health is a result of influences operating at multiple levels. For example, inadequate housing, poor educational attainment, and reduced access to health care are clustered together, and are all associated with reduced health. Policies which try to change individual people's behaviour have limited effect when people have little control over their environment. However, structural environmental change and an understanding of the way that influences interact with each other, has the potential to facilitate healthy choices irrespective of personal resources. The aim of Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) is to investigate the impact of gestational and postnatal environments on health, and to examine where structural change can be brought about to optimise health outcomes. The baseline assessment will focus on birth outcomes and maternal and infant health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Social Sciences 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,197,145
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,311
of 14,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,229
of 94,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#50
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.