You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliette Stehlé, Nicolas Voirin, Alain Barrat, Ciro Cattuto, Vittoria Colizza, Lorenzo Isella, Corinne Régis, Jean-François Pinton, Nagham Khanafer, Wouter Van den Broeck, Philippe Vanhems |
| Abstract |
The spread of infectious diseases crucially depends on the pattern of contacts between individuals. Knowledge of these patterns is thus essential to inform models and computational efforts. However, there are few empirical studies available that provide estimates of the number and duration of contacts between social groups. Moreover, their space and time resolutions are limited, so that data are not explicit at the person-to-person level, and the dynamic nature of the contacts is disregarded. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of data-driven dynamic contact patterns between individuals, and in particular of their temporal aspects, in shaping the spread of a simulated epidemic in the population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 22% |
| Belgium | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 28% |
| Researcher | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 6% |
| Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 41 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 33 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 24 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,110,556
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#773
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,569
of 121,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.