↓ Skip to main content

Late-onset bloodstream infections of Very-Low-Birth-Weight infants: data from the Polish Neonatology Surveillance Network in 2009–2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Late-onset bloodstream infections of Very-Low-Birth-Weight infants: data from the Polish Neonatology Surveillance Network in 2009–2011
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach, Ewa Gulczyńska, Marek Nowiczewski, Maria Borszewska-Kornacka, Joanna Domańska, T Allen Merritt, Ewa Helwich, Agnieszka Kordek, Dorota Pawlik, Janusz Gadzinowski, Jerzy Szczapa, Paweł Adamski, Małgorzata Sulik, Jerzy Klamka, Monika Brzychczy-Włoch, Piotr B Heczko

Abstract

Late-Onset Bloodstream Infections (LO-BSI) continue to be one of the most important complications associated with hospitalization of infants born with very low birth weight (VLBW). The aims of this study were to assess the epidemiology of LO-BSI together with the risk factors and the distribution of causative pathogens at six Polish neonatal intensive care units that participated in the Polish Neonatology Surveillance Network from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,820
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6,454
of 7,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,590
of 228,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#157
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.