You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Access to institutional delivery care and reasons for home delivery in three districts of Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-13-48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amon Exavery, Almamy Malick Kanté, Mustafa Njozi, Kassimu Tani, Henry V Doctor, Ahmed Hingora, James F Phillips |
| Abstract |
Globally, health facility delivery is encouraged as a single most important strategy in preventing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, access to facility-based delivery care remains low in many less developed countries. This study assesses facilitators and barriers to institutional delivery in three districts of Tanzania. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 21% |
| Lecturer | 38 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 71 | 18% |
| Unknown | 102 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 11% |
| Unknown | 105 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,405,958
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,001
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,161
of 206,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.