↓ Skip to main content

Human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells promote skin wound healing through paracrine signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells promote skin wound healing through paracrine signaling
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/scrt417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna I Arno, Saeid Amini-Nik, Patrick H Blit, Mohammed Al-Shehab, Cassandra Belo, Elaine Herer, Col Homer Tien, Marc G Jeschke

Abstract

The prevalence of non-healing wounds is predicted to increase due to the growing aging population. Despite the use of novel skin substitutes and wound dressings, poorly vascularized wound niches impair wound repair. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been reported to provide paracrine signals to promote wound healing, but the effect of human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) has not yet been described in human normal skin.The aim of this study is to examine the effects of human WJ-MSC paracrine signaling on normal skin fibroblasts in vitro, and in an in vivo preclinical model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 201 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 16%
Engineering 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 54 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,875,604
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#683
of 2,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,795
of 229,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.