↓ Skip to main content

The concept of risk and the value of novel markers of acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The concept of risk and the value of novel markers of acute kidney injury
Published in
Critical Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc12488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Ronco, Zaccaria Ricci

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Kashani and colleagues studied two novel markers, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2, in the urine of patients at high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). They validated these markers in a separate large multicenter study and compared them with known markers of AKI such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and kidney injury molecule-1. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 performed better than other known markers and their combination provided additional information. These markers could be useful in clinical practice to uncover silent episodes of AKI or to make an early identification of patients at risk. Ultimately they could help to detect and possibly prevent episodes of acute injury to the kidney, sometimes referred to as kidney attack.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,375,670
of 12,452,254 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,231
of 4,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,871
of 190,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#64
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,452,254 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.