↓ Skip to main content

The prospect of molecular therapy for Angelman syndrome and other monogenic neurologic disorders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 1,247)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prospect of molecular therapy for Angelman syndrome and other monogenic neurologic disorders
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-15-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara J Bailus, David J Segal

Abstract

Angelman syndrome is a monogenic neurologic disorder that affects 1 in 15,000 children, and is characterized by ataxia, intellectual disability, speech impairment, sleep disorders, and seizures. The disorder is caused by loss of central nervous system expression of UBE3A, a gene encoding a ubiquitin ligase. Current treatments focus on the management of symptoms, as there have not been therapies to treat the underlying molecular cause of the disease. However, this outlook is evolving with advances in molecular therapies, including artificial transcription factors a class of engineered DNA-binding proteins that have the potential to target a specific site in the genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Neuroscience 14 12%
Psychology 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,707,820
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#42
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,190
of 228,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.