You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Child’s assent in research: Age threshold or personalisation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcin Waligora, Vilius Dranseika, Jan Piasecki |
| Abstract |
Assent is an important ethical and legal requirement of paediatric research. Unfortunately, there are significant differences between the guidelines on the details of assent. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Poland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,506,295
of 25,050,563 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#260
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,358
of 234,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,050,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.