↓ Skip to main content

Directed evolution of a filamentous fungus for thermotolerance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 982)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Directed evolution of a filamentous fungus for thermotolerance
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-9-74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eudes de Crecy, Stefan Jaronski, Benjamin Lyons, Thomas J Lyons, Nemat O Keyhani

Abstract

Filamentous fungi are the most widely used eukaryotic biocatalysts in industrial and chemical applications. Consequently, there is tremendous interest in methodology that can use the power of genetics to develop strains with improved performance. For example, Metarhizium anisopliae is a broad host range entomopathogenic fungus currently under intensive investigation as a biologically based alternative to chemical pesticides. However, it use is limited by the relatively low tolerance of this species to abiotic stresses such as heat, with most strains displaying little to no growth between 35-37 degrees C. In this study, we used a newly developed automated continuous culture method called the Evolugator, which takes advantage of a natural selection-adaptation strategy, to select for thermotolerant variants of M. anisopliae strain 2575 displaying robust growth at 37 degrees C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 187 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 29%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#449,182
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#8
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,029
of 103,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.