You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Barriers for recess physical activity: a gender specific qualitative focus group exploration
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-639 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charlotte Skau Pawlowski, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Jasper Schipperijn, Jens Troelsen |
Abstract |
Many children, in particular girls, do not reach the recommended amount of daily physical activity. School recess provides an opportunity for both boys and girls to be physically active, but barriers to recess physical activity are not well understood. This study explores gender differences in children's perceptions of barriers to recess physical activity. Based on the socio-ecological model four types of environmental barriers were distinguished: natural, social, physical and organizational environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Belgium | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
Researcher | 20 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 15% |
Unknown | 44 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 39 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 35 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
Psychology | 11 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 12% |
Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#766,656
of 25,220,525 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#790
of 16,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,150
of 234,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,220,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.