You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical implications of neoepitope landscapes for adult and pediatric cancers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Medicine, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13073-017-0470-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yang-Yang Feng, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Griffith |
Abstract |
Many immunotherapies rely on the presence of neoepitopes derived from somatic mutations that lead to altered peptide sequences. Several studies have now analyzed the neoepitope landscape of different cancer subtypes, predominantly for adult samples, which tend to feature significantly higher mutational burden. However, a new report publishing the first comprehensive analysis of the pediatric neoepitope landscape suggests that immunotherapies could also hold promise for pediatric cancers.See related research article 10.1186/s13073-017-0468-3. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 69% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 10 | 77% |
Members of the public | 2 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 22% |
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,044,720
of 24,329,306 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#941
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,663
of 320,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,329,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.