↓ Skip to main content

Surgical wound infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical wound infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-6-171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert H Rubin

Abstract

Surgical wound infection remains a significant problem following an operation, although surveillance for such infections remains a challenge exacerbated by early discharge and outpatient surgery. The risk of such infections is determined by technical problems with the operation, particularly bleeding, the amount of devitalized tissue created, and the need for drains within the wound, as well as such metabolic factors as obesity and diabetes. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis can decrease the incidence of such infections further, but a technically perfect operation is even more important.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 22%
Student > Postgraduate 21 18%
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2010.
All research outputs
#7,444,605
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,531
of 7,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,463
of 155,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.