↓ Skip to main content

Preference, acceptability and implications of the rapid hepatitis C screening test among high-risk young people who inject drugs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preference, acceptability and implications of the rapid hepatitis C screening test among high-risk young people who inject drugs
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Hayes, Alya Briceno, Alice Asher, Michelle Yu, Jennifer L Evans, Judith A Hahn, Kimberly Page

Abstract

People who inject drugs (PWID) are at highest risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, yet many remain unaware of their infection status. New anti-HCV rapid testing has high potential to impact this.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,491,456
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,407
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,390
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#107
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.