↓ Skip to main content

A conceptual model for worksite intelligent physical exercise training - IPET - intervention for decreasing life style health risk indicators among employees: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A conceptual model for worksite intelligent physical exercise training - IPET - intervention for decreasing life style health risk indicators among employees: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisela Sjøgaard, Just Bendix Justesen, Mike Murray, Tina Dalager, Karen Søgaard

Abstract

Health promotion at the work site in terms of physical activity has proven positive effects but optimization of relevant exercise training protocols and implementation for high adherence are still scanty.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 189 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 16%
Sports and Recreations 31 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 15%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 42 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#9,905,692
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,256
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,569
of 191,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.