↓ Skip to main content

A conceptual model for worksite intelligent physical exercise training - IPET - intervention for decreasing life style health risk indicators among employees: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A conceptual model for worksite intelligent physical exercise training - IPET - intervention for decreasing life style health risk indicators among employees: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisela Sjøgaard, Just Bendix Justesen, Mike Murray, Tina Dalager, Karen Søgaard

Abstract

Health promotion at the work site in terms of physical activity has proven positive effects but optimization of relevant exercise training protocols and implementation for high adherence are still scanty.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 236 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 38 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,828
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,759
of 227,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#268
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.