You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case of recurrence of spiradenoma in palpebral conjunctiva
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2415-14-85 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinya Oie, Akira Sawada, Kiyofumi Mochizuki, Kozue Tsuji, Yoshinobu Hirose, Chiemi Saigo, Hiroshi Yoshikawa |
| Abstract |
To report a rare case of a recurrence of spiradenoma that developed in the upper eyelid. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#802
of 2,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,371
of 227,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.