You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: implications for clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-648 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guendalina Graffigna, Serena Barello, Chiara Libreri, Claudio A Bosio |
| Abstract |
Patient engagement (PE) is increasingly regarded as a key factor in the improvement of health behaviors and outcomes in the management of chronic disease, such as type 2 diabetes. This article explores (1) the reasons for disengagement of diabetic patients and their unique subjective attitudes from their experience and (2) the elements that may hinder PE in health management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 18% |
| Psychology | 25 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,317
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,563
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#242
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.