↓ Skip to main content

Diarrhea in young children from low-income countries leads to large-scale alterations in intestinal microbiota composition

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
44 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diarrhea in young children from low-income countries leads to large-scale alterations in intestinal microbiota composition
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihai Pop, Alan W Walker, Joseph Paulson, Brianna Lindsay, Martin Antonio, M Anowar Hossain, Joseph Oundo, Boubou Tamboura, Volker Mai, Irina Astrovskaya, Hector Corrada Bravo, Richard Rance, Mark Stares, Myron M Levine, Sandra Panchalingam, Karen Kotloff, Usman N Ikumapayi, Chinelo Ebruke, Mitchell Adeyemi, Dilruba Ahmed, Firoz Ahmed, Meer Taifur Alam, Ruhul Amin, Sabbir Siddiqui, John B Ochieng, Emmanuel Ouma, Jane Juma, Euince Mailu, Richard Omore, J Glenn Morris, Robert F Breiman, Debasish Saha, Julian Parkhill, James P Nataro, O Colin Stine

Abstract

Diarrheal diseases continue to contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality in infants and young children in developing countries. There is an urgent need to better understand the contributions of novel, potentially uncultured, diarrheal pathogens to severe diarrheal disease, as well as distortions in normal gut microbiota composition that might facilitate severe disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 339 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 19%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Professor 21 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 63 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 7%
Computer Science 13 4%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 85 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#617,173
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#378
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,627
of 242,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.