You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A single consumption of curry improved postprandial endothelial function in healthy male subjects: a randomized, controlled crossover trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-67 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hideki Nakayama, Nobuaki Tsuge, Hiroshi Sawada, Noriya Masamura, Shohei Yamada, Shigeki Satomi, Yukihito Higashi |
Abstract |
Curry, one of the most popular foods in Japan, contains spices that are rich in potentially antioxidative compounds, such as curcumin and eugenol. Oxidative stress is thought to impair endothelial function associated with atherosclerosis, a leading cause of cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single consumption of curry meal would improve endothelial function in healthy men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 34 | 26% |
United States | 3 | 2% |
Spain | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 86 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 120 | 92% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
Scientists | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Researcher | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#300,918
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#104
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,409
of 243,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.