You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne CC Lee, Simon Cousens, Stephen N Wall, Susan Niermeyer, Gary L Darmstadt, Waldemar A Carlo, William J Keenan, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Christopher Gill, Joy E Lawn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 470 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Researcher | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 8% |
| Other | 105 | 22% |
| Unknown | 117 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 180 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Unknown | 132 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,158,045
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,418
of 14,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,646
of 109,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#23
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.