You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
IVT-seq reveals extreme bias in RNA sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas F Lahens, Ibrahim Halil Kavakli, Ray Zhang, Katharina Hayer, Michael B Black, Hannah Dueck, Angel Pizarro, Junhyong Kim, Rafael Irizarry, Russell S Thomas, Gregory R Grant, John B Hogenesch |
| Abstract |
RNA-seq is a powerful technique for identifying and quantifying transcription and splicing events, both known and novel. However, given its recent development and the proliferation of library construction methods, understanding the bias it introduces is incomplete but critical to realizing its value. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 5 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 58 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 46 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 505 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 454 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 135 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 6% |
| Professor | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 244 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 119 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#516,894
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#290
of 4,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,512
of 242,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.