You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-5-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaan Kaya, Raif Cavolli, Alpaslan Telli, Mehmet Fazil Tolga Soyal, Alp Aslan, Gökhan Gokaslan, Şahin Mursel, Refik Tasoz |
| Abstract |
Although off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery has many beneficial effects compared with on-pump surgery, switch to on-pump surgery has significantly higher risks of operative mortality. Benefits of OPCAB over on-pump surgery strategies concerning myocardial revascularization are still debatable. We have aimed to develop an "algorithm of off-pump surgical strategy" on preventing conversion to on-pump. This clinical study reports our clinical outcome of OPCAB in patients with acute coronary syndrome. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#383
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,722
of 95,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.