You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting physical therapists’ use of research evidence to inform clinical practice: part 2 - a mixed methods evaluation of the PEAK program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie K Tilson, Sharon Mickan, Jonathan C Sum, Maria Zibell, Jacquelyn M Dylla, Robbin Howard |
| Abstract |
Clinicians need innovative educational programs to enhance their capacity for using research evidence to inform clinical decision-making. This paper and its companion paper introduce the Physical therapist-driven Education for Actionable Knowledge translation (PEAK) program, an educational program designed to promote physical therapists' integration of research evidence into clinical decision-making. This, second of two, papers reports a mixed methods feasibility study of the PEAK program among physical therapists at three university-based clinical facilities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 32% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,528,410
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#851
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,700
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#19
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.