You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using an ACTIVE teaching format versus a standard lecture format for increasing resident interaction and knowledge achievement during noon conference: a prospective, controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-129 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam P Sawatsky, Kathryn Berlacher, Rosanne Granieri |
Abstract |
The traditional lecture is used by many residency programs to fulfill the mandate for regular didactic sessions, despite limited evidence to demonstrate its effectiveness. Active teaching strategies have shown promise in improving medical knowledge but have been challenging to implement within the constraints of residency training. We developed and evaluated an innovative structured format for interactive teaching within the residency noon conference. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 36% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 29% |
Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 50% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,183,655
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#544
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,966
of 227,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.