You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adaptation and validation of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) in English using an internet platform
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-12-109 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Viet-Thi Tran, Magdalena Harrington, Victor M Montori, Caroline Barnes, Paul Wicks, Philippe Ravaud |
Abstract |
Treatment burden refers to the workload imposed by healthcare on patients, and the effect this has on quality of life. The Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) aims to assess treatment burden in different condition and treatment contexts. Here, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of an English version of the TBQ, a scale that was originally developed in French. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 32% |
United States | 4 | 21% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 17% |
Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
Other | 33 | 18% |
Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 7% |
Psychology | 11 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 59 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,760,375
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,237
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,985
of 234,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#21
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.