You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Osiris: accessible and reproducible phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses within the Galaxy workflow management system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Todd H Oakley, Markos A Alexandrou, Roger Ngo, M Sabrina Pankey, Celia K C Churchill, William Chen, Karl B Lopker |
| Abstract |
Phylogenetic tools and 'tree-thinking' approaches increasingly permeate all biological research. At the same time, phylogenetic data sets are expanding at breakneck pace, facilitated by increasingly economical sequencing technologies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for accessible, modular, and sharable tools for phylogenetic analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Sweden | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 60 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,715,483
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,776
of 7,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,849
of 229,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#40
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.