You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the prone hip extension test and active straight leg raise test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-709x-22-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A Bruno, David P Millar, Dale A Goertzen |
| Abstract |
Two clinical tests used to assess for neuromuscular control deficits in low back pain (LBP) patients are the prone hip extension (PHE) test and active straight leg raise (ASLR) test. For these tests, it has been suggested examiners classify patients as "positive" or "negative" based on the presence or absence (respectively) of specific "abnormal" lumbopelvic motion patterns. The inter-rater agreement of such a classification scheme has been reported for the PHE test, but not for the ASLR test. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of such classification schemes have not been reported for either test. The primary objectives of the current study were to investigate: 1) the inter-rater agreement of the examiner-reported classification schemes for these two tests, and 2) the sensitivity and specificity of the classification schemes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 26% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |