You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-9-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia A Daley, Amber Abbott, Patrick S Doyle, Glenn A Nader, Stephanie Larson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 391 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 115 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 11% |
| Canada | 14 | 4% |
| Australia | 9 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Unknown | 168 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 288 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 74 | 19% |
| Scientists | 21 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,097 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1058 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 189 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 168 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 136 | 12% |
| Researcher | 126 | 11% |
| Other | 68 | 6% |
| Other | 213 | 19% |
| Unknown | 197 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 377 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 205 | 19% |
| Unknown | 245 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,647
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 103,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them