↓ Skip to main content

Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-4-212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette Boaz, Juan Baeza, Alec Fraser, the European Implementation Score Collaborative Group (EIS)

Abstract

The gap between research findings and clinical practice is well documented and a range of interventions has been developed to increase the implementation of research into clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Canada 6 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 292 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 17%
Student > Master 52 17%
Other 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 37 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 24%
Social Sciences 57 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 15%
Psychology 25 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 3%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 48 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,980,939
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#558
of 4,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,524
of 116,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.