↓ Skip to main content

Fascia as a Proprioceptive Organ and its Role in Chronic Pain - a Review of Current Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Safety in Health, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fascia as a Proprioceptive Organ and its Role in Chronic Pain - a Review of Current Literature
Published in
Safety in Health, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/2056-5917-1-s1-a2
Authors

Cornelia Kopeinig, Barbara Gödl-Purrer, Beate Salchinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,446,373
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Safety in Health
#50
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,383
of 285,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Safety in Health
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.