↓ Skip to main content

Long-term neurologic and cardiac correction by intrathecal gene therapy in Pompe disease

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term neurologic and cardiac correction by intrathecal gene therapy in Pompe disease
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40478-017-0464-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Hordeaux, L. Dubreil, C. Robveille, J. Deniaud, Q. Pascal, B. Dequéant, J. Pailloux, L. Lagalice, M. Ledevin, C. Babarit, P. Costiou, F. Jamme, M. Fusellier, Y. Mallem, C. Ciron, C. Huchet, C. Caillaud, M-A Colle

Abstract

Pompe disease is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by acid-α-glucosidase (GAA) deficiency, leading to glycogen storage. The disease manifests as a fatal cardiomyopathy in infantile form. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has recently prolonged the lifespan of these patients, revealing a new natural history. The neurologic phenotype and the persistence of selective muscular weakness in some patients could be attributed to the central nervous system (CNS) storage uncorrected by ERT. GAA-KO 6neo/6neo mice were treated with a single intrathecal administration of adeno-associated recombinant vector (AAV) mediated gene transfer of human GAA at 1 month and their neurologic, neuromuscular, and cardiac function was assessed for 1 year. We demonstrate a significant functional neurologic correction in treated animals from 4 months onward, a neuromuscular improvement from 9 months onward, and a correction of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at 12 months. The regions most affected by the disease i.e. the brainstem, spinal cord, and the left cardiac ventricular wall all show enzymatic, biochemical and histological correction. Muscle glycogen storage is not affected by the treatment, thus suggesting that the restoration of muscle functionality is directly related to the CNS correction. This unprecedented global and long-term CNS and cardiac cure offer new perspectives for the management of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 38 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,446,373
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#1,320
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,643
of 315,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.