You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A novel technique to quantify the instantaneous mitral regurgitant rate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-74 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Seth Uretsky, Farooq A Chaudhry, Linda Gillam, Srinivasa Gurram, Sri Lakshmi Kala Bonda, Harikrishna Ponnam, Eric Bader, Naganath Thota, Randy Cohen, Azhar Supariwala, Steven D Wolff |
Abstract |
The systolic variation of mitral regurgitation (MR) is a pitfall in its quantification. Current recommendations advocate using quantitative echocardiographic techniques that account for this systolic variation. While prior studies have qualitatively described patterns of systolic variation no study has quantified this variation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#23,323,746
of 25,990,981 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,295
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,264
of 213,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.