You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of high-identity segmental duplications in the grapevine genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-436 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuliana Giannuzzi, Pietro D'Addabbo, Marica Gasparro, Maurizio Martinelli, Francesco N Carelli, Donato Antonacci, Mario Ventura |
| Abstract |
Segmental duplications (SDs) are blocks of genomic sequence of 1-200 kb that map to different loci in a genome and share a sequence identity > 90%. SDs show at the sequence level the same characteristics as other regions of the human genome: they contain both high-copy repeats and gene sequences. SDs play an important role in genome plasticity by creating new genes and modeling genome structure. Although data is plentiful for mammals, not much was known about the representation of SDs in plant genomes. In this regard, we performed a genome-wide analysis of high-identity SDs on the sequenced grapevine (Vitis vinifera) genome (PN40024). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 29% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2011.
All research outputs
#14,136,253
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,672
of 10,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,152
of 124,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#34
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.