↓ Skip to main content

Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 4,422)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
162 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
11 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
295 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
611 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A Laird, Jayce Gilbert, Peter Kent, Jennifer L Keating

Abstract

Clinicians commonly examine posture and movement in people with the belief that correcting dysfunctional movement may reduce pain. If dysfunctional movement is to be accurately identified, clinicians should know what constitutes normal movement and how this differs in people with low back pain (LBP). This systematic review examined studies that compared biomechanical aspects of lumbo-pelvic movement in people with and without LBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 610 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 17%
Student > Bachelor 82 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 8%
Other 48 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 8%
Other 117 19%
Unknown 167 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 130 21%
Sports and Recreations 60 10%
Engineering 26 4%
Neuroscience 18 3%
Other 50 8%
Unknown 183 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#154,346
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#12
of 4,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,193
of 240,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.