↓ Skip to main content

Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 3,784)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
124 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
6 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
520 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A Laird, Jayce Gilbert, Peter Kent, Jennifer L Keating

Abstract

Clinicians commonly examine posture and movement in people with the belief that correcting dysfunctional movement may reduce pain. If dysfunctional movement is to be accurately identified, clinicians should know what constitutes normal movement and how this differs in people with low back pain (LBP). This systematic review examined studies that compared biomechanical aspects of lumbo-pelvic movement in people with and without LBP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 519 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 20%
Student > Bachelor 74 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 9%
Other 44 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Other 106 20%
Unknown 104 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 120 23%
Sports and Recreations 52 10%
Engineering 26 5%
Neuroscience 16 3%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 120 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#379,594
of 21,374,328 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#36
of 3,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,723
of 202,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,374,328 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them