↓ Skip to main content

Rapid evolution of BRCA1 and BRCA2in humans and other primates

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid evolution of BRCA1 and BRCA2in humans and other primates
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-14-155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dianne I Lou, Ross M McBee, Uyen Q Le, Anne C Stone, Gregory K Wilkerson, Ann M Demogines, Sara L Sawyer

Abstract

The maintenance of chromosomal integrity is an essential task of every living organism and cellular repair mechanisms exist to guard against insults to DNA. Given the importance of this process, it is expected that DNA repair proteins would be evolutionarily conserved, exhibiting very minimal sequence change over time. However, BRCA1, an essential gene involved in DNA repair, has been reported to be evolving rapidly despite the fact that many protein-altering mutations within this gene convey a significantly elevated risk for breast and ovarian cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 3%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,503
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,401
of 241,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#22
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.