↓ Skip to main content

The potential use of spectral electromyographic fatigue as a screening and outcome monitoring tool of sarcopenic back muscle alterations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential use of spectral electromyographic fatigue as a screening and outcome monitoring tool of sarcopenic back muscle alterations
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Kienbacher, Richard Habenicht, Christian Starek, Patrick Mair, Markus Wolf, Birgit Paul, Sara Riegler, Josef Kollmitzer, Gerold Ebenbichler

Abstract

To examine whether or not median frequency surface electromyographic (MF-EMG) back muscle fatigue monitoring would be able to identify alterations in back muscle function in elderly muscles, if a protocol was used that allowed optimum standardization of the processes underlying electromyographic fatigue, and whether these tests were reliable from day to day.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Engineering 8 15%
Sports and Recreations 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#272
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,553
of 242,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.