You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12966-014-0089-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philip J Morgan, Hayley A Scott, Myles D Young, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Clare E Collins, Robin Callister |
Abstract |
Despite rising international rates of obesity, men remain reluctant to participate in weight loss research. There is a lack of evidence to guide the development of effective weight loss interventions that engage men. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive process evaluation of the SHED-IT (Self-Help, Exercise and Diet using Information Technology) weight loss program for men, as delivered in the SHED-IT community weight loss trial, and to identify key components associated with success. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 226 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 17% |
Researcher | 30 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 13% |
Unknown | 44 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 15% |
Psychology | 27 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 14% |
Unknown | 58 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,444,781
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,567
of 1,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,123
of 226,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.